缬沙坦治疗老年高血压的临床疗效及对患者肝肾功能的影响

时间:2024-04-19 14:37 来源:当代医学 作者:黄青明,邓宗锐

 

栏目:论著

 


 


(重庆市开州区第二人民医院全科,重庆    400000

 

 

摘要:目的    探讨缬沙坦治疗老年高血压的临床疗效及对患者肝肾功能的影响。方法    选取20207月至20217重庆市开州区第二人民医院收治的100例老年高血压患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(行常规基础治疗)和观察组(在对照组基础上加用缬沙坦),每组50例。对照组行常规基础治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用缬沙坦,比较两组肾功能指标[肌酐(Cr)、尿酸(UA)、尿素(UREA]、肝功能指标[碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT]、血压控制情况、内皮细胞功能、临床疗效。结果    治疗前,两组UREAUACr水平比较差异无统计学意义;治疗后,两组UREAUACr水平均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。治疗前,两组GGTALPALTALT水平比较差异无统计学意义;治疗后,两组GGTALPALTAST水平均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。治疗前,两组DBPSBP比较差异无统计学意义;治疗后,两组DBPSBP均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗前,两组NOET-1比较差异无统计学意义;治疗8周后,两组NO水平均高于治疗前,ET-1均低于治疗前,且观察组NO高于对照组,ET-1低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。观察组治疗总有效率为98.00%,高于对照组的84.00%差异有统计学意义(P0.05结论    缬沙坦治疗老年高血压患者疗效显著,可明显改善患者肝肾功能,值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 老年;高血压;缬沙坦;肝功能指标;肾功能指标

Clinical efficacy of valsartan in the treatment of senile hypertension and its influence on liver and kidney function.

 

HUANG Qingming, DENG Zongrui

(Department of General, the Second People' s Hospital of Kaizhou District, Chongqing, Chongqing 400000, China)

Abstract: Objective  To explore the clinical efficacy of valsartan in the treatment of senile hypertension and its influence on liver and kidney function. Methods  100 elderly hypertensive patients admitted to the Second People's Hospital of Kaizhou District in Chongqing from July 2020 to July 2021were selected as the research object, and they were randomly divided into the control group (routine basic treatment) and the observation group (valsartan on the basis of the control group), with 50 cases in each group. The control group received routine basic treatment, while the observation group received valsartan on the basis of the control group. The indexes of renal function (creatinine [Cr], uric acid [UA] and urea [UREA]), liver function (alkaline phosphatase [ALP], γ -glutamyltranspeptidase [GGT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine transaminase [ALT]) and blood pressure control were compared between the two groups. Results  Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the levels of UREA, UA and Cr between the two groups; after treatment, the levels of UREA, UA and Cr of the two groups were lower than before treatment, and the observation group was lower than the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in GGT, ALP, ALT and ALT levels between the two groups; after treatment, the levels of GGT, ALP, ALT and AST of the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference in DBP and SBP between the two groups; after treatment, the DBP and SBP of the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in NO and ET-1 between the two groups before treatment; after 8 weeks of treatment, NO of the two groups was higher than that before treatment, and ET-1 was lower than that before treatment, NO in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and ET-1 was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The total effective rate in the observation group was 98.00%, which was higher than 84.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Valsartan is effective in the treatment of elderly patients with hypertension, which can obviously improve the liver and kidney function of patients and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Keywords: Old age; Hypertension; Valsartan; Liver function index; Renal function index

 

高血压是以失眠、头晕等为典型症状的常见心血管综合征[1],主要特征是体循环动脉压升高[2],病死率高且病程长,好发于老年群体[3],若不及时、规范治疗,易造成心、肝、肾等器官损伤,尤其是老年高血压患者具有血压波动大、脉压差大等特征[4],更易增加并发症的发生风险,威胁其生命安全。目前,临床主要结合老年高血压患者的病情程度、年龄等制定降压目标,且常采用利尿剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ANGIotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsACEI)、钙拮抗剂等药物。有研究显示,缬沙坦能抑制肾素-血管紧张素系统,降压效果显著,扩张肾小球动脉,促进受损肝组织修复,有助于延缓肝肾损害[5]。基于此,本研究选取100例老年高血压患者作为研究对象,旨在探讨缬沙坦治疗老年高血压患者的效果及对患者肝肾功能的影响,现报道如下。

1  资料与方法

1.1    临床资料    选取20207月至20217重庆市开州区第二人民医院收治100例老年高血压患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,每组50例。对照组男29例,女21例;年龄6178岁,平均(69.9±3.4)岁;病程211年,平均(6.6±1.3)年;高血压分级:10例,25例,15例。观察组男31例,女19例;年龄6379岁,平均(70.5±3.3)岁;病程212年,平均(6.9±1.2)年;高血压分级:9例,25例,16例。两组临床资料比较差异无统计学意义,具有可比性。本研究经本院医学伦理委员会审核批准。

纳入标准:①基于《中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)》[6]、临床检查(如血压检查)等确诊;②原发性高血压,舒张压(diastolic blood pressureDBP90mmHg1mmHg=0.133kPa),收缩压(systolic blood pressureSBP140mmHg;③对本研究知情并签署知情同意书,自愿参与本研究。排除标准:①恶性高血压、高血压危象患者;②对本研究所用药物有过敏反应者;③近期发生炎症头颅外伤者;④血脂代谢紊乱、糖尿病者;⑤重大脏器功能衰竭者;⑥合并恶性肿瘤者;急慢性感染性疾病者。

1.2    方法    对照组采用常规基础治疗,包括非重体力劳动、控制发病诱因、低钠饮食、运动干预等,同时口服苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平片(山东凤凰制药股份有限公司,国药准字H20083828),每次2.5mg,每天1次。观察组在对照组基础上加用缬沙坦(常州四药制药有限公司,国药准字H20010823)口服治疗,每次80 mg,每天1次。两组均治疗8周。

1.3    观察指标    肝、肾功能指标:治疗前后,抽取患者空腹静脉血5ml,以离心半径12.5cm3000 r/min离心10min,采用BIOBASE全自动生化分析仪(山东博科生物产业有限公司)检测肾功能指标[肌酐(serum creatinineCr)、尿酸(uric acidUA)、尿素(UreaUREA]及肝功能指标[碱性磷酸酶(alkaline phosphataseALP)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(γ-glutamyl transpeptidaseGGT)、谷草转氨酶(aspartate aminotransferaseAST)、谷丙转氨酶(alanine transaminaseALT][7]血压控制情况:选用OMRON(欧姆龙)血压计,测量前静坐10min,测量DBPSBP,每位患者均测3次后取平均值[8]内皮细胞功能:采血患者空腹静脉血5 ml,以离心半径15.0cm3500 r/min离心10 min,采用酶联免疫法检测一氧化氮(nitric oxideNO)及内皮素(endothelin-1ET-1)水平[9]临床疗效:无效,DBPSBP降低<10mmHg;有效,DBPSBP降低1020mmHg;显效,DBPSBP降低20mmHg。总有效率=有效率+显效率[10]

1.4    统计学方法    采用SPSS 23.00统计学软件进行数据分析,计量资料以“x±s”表示,采用t检验,计数资料以[n%]表示,采用χ2检验,以P0.05为差异有统计学意义。

2  结果

2.1    两组肾功能指标比较    治疗前,两组UREAUACr水平比较差异无统计学意义;治疗后,两组UREAUACr水平均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。见表1

 

1    两组肾功能指标比较x±s

Table 1  Comparison of renal function indexes between the two groups (x±s)

 

组别

例数

UREAmmol/L

UA(μmol/L

Cr(μmol/L

治疗前

治疗后

治疗前

治疗后

治疗前

治疗后

对照组

50

8.21±0.64

7.56±0.25a

351.51±25.37

327.73±21.27a

90.67±7.29

85.73±5.39a

观察组

50

8.24±0.74

5.70±0.22a

350.99±24.75

280.37±19.85a

90.34±7.22

76.85±5.60a

t

 

0.217

39.494

0.104

11.511

0.227

8.079

P

 

0.829

0.001

0.918

0.001

0.821

0.001

注:UREA,尿素;UA,尿酸;Cr,肌酐。与本组治疗前比较,aP0.05

 

2.2    两组肝功能指标比较    治疗前,两组GGTALPALTALT水平比较差异无统计学意义;治疗后,两组GGTALPALTAST水平均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。见表2

 

2    两组肝功能指标比较x±sIU/L

Table 2  Comparison of liver function indexes between the two groups (x±s, IU/L)

 

组别

例数

GGT

ALP

ALT

AST

治疗前

治疗后

治疗前

治疗后

治疗前

治疗后

治疗前

治疗后

对照组

50

27.24±1.26

25.31±1.67a

168.42±12.85

153.80±11.31a

20.96±2.52

18.51±1.33a

39.77±2.27

37.53±2.38a

观察组

50

27.73±1.66

22.61±1.78a

167.99±13.07

108.46±11.37a

20.66±2.27

16.23±1.16a

39.35±2.90

29.72±2.53a

t

 

1.663

7.822

0.166

19.991

0.625

9.135

0.806

15.899

P

 

0.099

0.001

0.869

0.001

0.533

0.001

0.422

0.001

 

注:GGT,γ-谷氨酰转肽酶;ALP,碱性磷酸酶;ALT,谷丙转氨酶;AST,谷草转氨酶。与本组治疗前比较,aP0.05

2.3    两组血压控制情况比较    治疗前,两组DBPSBP比较差异无统计学意义;治疗后,两组DBPSBP均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。见表3

 

3    两组血压控制情况比较x±smmHg

Table 3  Comparison of blood pressure control between the two groups (x±s, mmHg)

 

组别

例数

DBP

SBP

治疗前

治疗后

治疗前

治疗后

对照组

50

100.42±9.68

93.37±6.77a

151.16±11.77

136.85±10.19a

观察组

50

100.59±10.37

86.25±6.69a

150.39±11.65

122.56±10.58a

t

 

0.085

5.289

0.329

6.879

P

 

0.933

0.001

0.743

0.001

注:DBP,舒张压;SBP,收缩压。与本组治疗前比较,aP0.05

2.4    两组内皮细胞功能比较    治疗前,两组NOET-1水平比较差异无统计学意义;治疗后,两组NO水平均高于治疗前,ET-1均低于治疗前,且观察组NO高于对照组,ET-1低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。见表4

 

4两组内皮细胞功能比较x±s

Table 4 Comparison of endothelial cell function between the two groups (x±s)

 

组别

例数

NOumol/L

ET-1ng/L

治疗前

治疗后

治疗前

治疗后

对照组

50

30.68±3.34

44.57±2.61a

47.38±4.85

39.86±4.45a

观察组

50

30.85±3.62

59.87±2.32a

47.63±4.35

35.24±4.93a

t

 

0.244

30.981

0.271

4.919

P

 

0.808

0.001

0.787

0.001

注:NO,一氧化氮;ET-1,内皮素。与本组治疗前比较,aP0.05

2.5   两组临床疗效比较    观察组治疗有效率为98.00%,高于对照组的84.00%差异有统计学意义(P0.05,见表5

 

5    两组临床疗效比较[n%]

Table 5  Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups [n(%)]

组别

例数

无效

有效

显效

总有效

对照组

50

816.00

2550.00

1734.00

4284.00

观察组

50

12.00

2142.00

2856.00

4998.00

χ2

 

 

 

 

4.400

P

 

 

 

 

0.036

3  讨论

老年高血压发病机制复杂[11],与遗传、肾脏排钠能力减弱、压力感受器作用减弱、血小板功能增强、交感神经系统α、大动脉功能减退等机制密切相关,典型特征是SBP增高、脉压差增大等[12-13],同时常合并糖尿病、血脂异常等多种疾病,所以血压控制难度大,尚需不断完善治疗方案,以便增强血压控制效果,提升老年患者生命质量,保障生命安全[14-15]

本研究结果表明,观察组治疗有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。分析原因为,苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平能阻断心肌细胞、血管平滑肌细胞外钙离子进入细胞,放松血管平滑肌,发挥降压作用,且半衰期较长,基本在2545h,所以降压效果持久且稳定,连续口服1周后能稳定血药浓度,而给药4周后能取得最佳降压效果,但随着时间推移,其药物作用有所延迟,另外,缬沙坦是选择性较高的血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(angiotensin receptor antagonistsARB),能间接激活血管紧张素受体2angiotensin II receptor 2AT2),减轻心脏负担,舒张血管,发挥降压作用[16-18],当联合采用上述两种药物时,能延长作用时间,增强降压作用,且也能降低峰谷比及减少血压波动,更适用于治疗老年高血压患者。本研究结果显示,治疗后,两组NO水平均高于治疗前,ET-1水平均低于治疗前,观察组NO高于对照组,ET-1低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。提示缬沙坦能提高NO水平,减少ET-1,有助于延缓靶器官损害。高血压病理变化包括内皮细胞损伤、血管通透性提升、肾血管与全身小动脉痉挛[19-20],易使蛋白渗入至组织间隙,造成蛋白合成功能障碍,损伤血液中蛋白,另外,高血压病情迁延后伴有血容量升高,此时肾脏负荷加重,易增加UREAUACr等代谢物质,加重肾脏耗氧量,表现为肾脏对灌注量、缺氧情况较为敏感,此外,老年高血压患者因病情重、合并基础疾病多、身体机能减退等,也常伴有肝脏损害。本研究结果显示,治疗后,两组UREAUACr水平均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05;治疗后,两组GGTALPALTAST水平均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05。与刘晓慧[21]研究报道一致,提示加用缬沙坦还能改善老年高血压患者的肝肾功能,分析原因为,缬沙坦能改善血管顺应性,增加肾小球滤过率,扩张肾小球动脉,有效保护肾脏,同时能减少ET-1合成,改善肝细胞及内皮细胞功能,增肌肝脏血流量,改善肝脏微循环,减轻肝内血管阻力,激活肝脏生长因子,修复受损肝组织,且缬沙坦重复给药也无药物蓄积,也不会影响血流动力学,所以肝脏、肾脏负荷较轻,高剂量用药虽然能避免肾功能退化,但可能会发生咳嗽、头晕头痛等不良反应[22-23]。本研究尚存在一定不足,未观察两组不良反应,且随访时间短、样本量小等,可能影响结果有效性、一般性,需增大样本量,延长随访时间,进一步深入研究。

综上所述,缬沙坦能有效治疗老年高血压,且能改善患者内皮功能及肝肾功能,增强血压控制效果,值得临床推广应用。

 

参考文献

[1]    段学峰,朱冬红,徐光标,.肾炎舒片联合缬沙坦胶囊对老年高血压肾病微炎症状态、营养不良及肾功能的影响[J].中华中医药学刊,2022,40(2):194-197.

[2]    庄见钦,熊锋,冼碧玲.缬沙坦氨氯地平片降压治疗对老年高血压患者血压变异性的影响[J].中国药物经济学,2020,15(12):110-115.

[3]    卢增艳.缬沙坦氨氯地平片治疗老年高血压合并肾功能不全的临床疗效[J].慢性病学杂志,2020,21(8):1214-1216.

[4]    杨继中,陈阳.缬沙坦联合卡托普利片在老年高血压中的应用[J].上海医药,2020,41(9):34-35,40.

[5]    吴雪娇.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦治疗老年高血压的疗效及对血压变异性的影响[J].临床医学,2021,41(7):91-92.

[6]    中国高血压防治指南修订委员会,高血压联盟(中国,中华医学会心血管病学分会中国医师协会高血压专业委员会,.中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J].中国心血管杂志,2019,24(1):24-56.

[7]    张玉磊.滋肾化浊汤加减联合缬沙坦治疗老年高血压早期肾损害的效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2019,4(2):115-116.

[8]    韦立.缬沙坦联合氨氯地平对老年高血压合并2型糖尿病患者血压、血糖和血尿酸水平的影响[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(20):3781-3782.

[9]    韩瑜.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪治疗对老年高血压患者血压变异性及内皮细胞功能的影响研究[J].中国合理用药探索,2019,16(8):115-117,121.

[10]  唐正萍,赵志颖,金静,.缬沙坦氨氯地平片对老年高血压患者血压变异性和血管弹性功能的影响[J].中华高血压杂志,2019,27(10):964-967.

[11]  李兵,孙成磊,程国良,.缬沙坦对老年高血压患者睡眠质量的影响[J].中国老年保健医学,2020,18(2):50-52.

[12]  方宁远.血管紧张素受体拮抗剂联合氢氯噻嗪治疗老年高血压[J].中华高血压杂志,2019,27(11):1013-1016.

[13]  何永泉.苯磺酸氨氯地平联合缬沙坦治疗老年高血压的效果观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2021,14(16):47-49.

[14]  秦向阳,树鸣霞,郭彩霞,.缬沙坦联合氨氯地平对老年高血压患者动态血压及肾功能的影响[J].西藏医药,2021,42(1):89-91.

[15]  NIELSEN PM, GRIMM D, WEHLAND M, et al. The combination of valsartan and sacubitril in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure - an update[J]. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2018,122(1):9-18.

[16]  CHRYSANT SG. Benefits and pitfalls of sacubitril/valsartan treatment in patients with hypertension[J]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 2018,20(2):351-355.

[17]  STAVROPOULOS K, IMPRIALOS KP, DOUMAS M. Sacubitril/valsartan instead of renin-angiotensin system inhibition alone: a step forward in resistant hypertension[J]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 2018,20(1):65-68.

[18]  SEKI T, GOTO K, KANSUI Y, et al. Angiotensin II receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan improves endothelial dysfunction in spontaneously hypertensive rats[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2017,6(10):e006617.

[19]  JORDAN J, STINKENS R, JAX T, et al. Improved insulin sensitivity with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition in individuals with obesity and hypertension[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2017,101(2):254-263.

[20]  ZHAO Y, MA R, YU X, et al. AHU377+Valsartan (LCZ696) modulates renin-angiotensin system (ras) in the cardiac of female spontaneously hypertensive rats compared with valsartan[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther, 2019,24(5):450-459.

[21]  刘晓慧.缬沙坦对老年高血压患者肝功能、肾功能的影响[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2021,28(7):1151-1154.

[22]  ANDERSEN MB, SIMONSEN U, WEHLAND M, et al. LCZ696 (Valsartan/Sacubitril)—a possible new treatment for hypertension and heart failure[J]. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2016,118(1):14-22.

[23]  UPADHYA B, KOZAK PM, STACEY RB, et al. Newer drugs to reduce high blood pressure and mitigate hypertensive target organ damage[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep, 2022,24(1):1-20.